It would be an understatement to say that I am no big fan of President Obama or his policies. I find him imperious (in fairness, I find most politicians imperious), I’m not convinced his motivations are what I think they should be, and I’d like my country to remain free-market based with as little government interference as possible, and it’s pretty clear he’s going to do everything he can to change that. So, not a big fan.
However, I am a huge fan of keeping the President of the United States safe. Michaele and Tareq Salai, the gate crashers at the White House, are yet another example of how off the rails our society has flown. These people want to grab themselves a reality tv gig. What better start than to crash the President’s first State dinner? Well, they looked fabulous strolling in, she attired in a gorgeous red beaded sari, long blond hair flowing gracefully down her back, and he in an elegant tailored suit, all smiles and fabulousness.
Which is I guess what influenced the Secret Service to give them a pass to go on in and hang with the president, even though their names were not on any admittance list, and, yes, I’m going to say it, despite the fact that Mr. Salai has a, um, Middle Eastern˗seeming name. Obviously, not everyone with a Middle Eastern/Arab/Muslim name is, or should be considered, suspicious. Obviously. But, uh, when someone pops by the White House when the President and the Vice President are hosting an official State event, and this, um, gentleman’s name is not on the list, and he is insisting on being allowed inside, and his name is Middle Eastern, or close enough that it might as well be, then I think that maybe the Secret Service ought to do its damn job and not give this unknown person free access to the leader of the free world.
These people walked right up to our President. They touched him. They touched our Vice President. Luckily, these two low-lifes were just out to diddle themselves and to grab their 15 minutes of fame. But what about all the other people who are out to wage Jihad, to destroy America, to turn the free world into a medieval Gulag? What about them? Well, now they know that all they have to do is put on a snazzy suit, toss a blond into a pretty dress and attach her to their arm, and then play the role of imperious upper class socialite who simply cannot believe their name isn’t on The List, and in they go. To do whatever they want to the President of the United States. To harm him. To hold him and his second in command hostage while they make whatever demands they want of America.
Absolutely wonderful. How safe do you feel? Our President is NOT secure. He is vulnerable and exposed because our Secret Service is so penetrable that STRANGERS were allowed access to our leader simply by showing up groomed and well dressed and insisting on admittance. That is all it takes. I’m safer than the President because I don’t let strangers into my parties. My friends know not to let strangers in. I’m safer than the President, than the Vice President, and all I have is a baseball bat.
Mr. President, it’s time to get a baseball bat. It’ll be much more reliable than the Secret Service, and you can keep your safety in your own hands, while the Secret Service turns what should be secure private events into public open houses.
Haiti missionaries, Haiti, earthquake, poverty, evangelism, Baptists, imperialism, slavery, kidnapping
The Baptist 10: Or, We’re Going to Make Sure You Get the Lord’s Protection Even If It Means Stealing You from Your Families and Kidnapping You from Your Homeland
In News commentary, Political commentary on February 5, 2010 at 10:49 amHey, they meant well! Anyone who wants to help any poor starving orphan get food, shelter, and religion (well, the right religion) should be praised, right? Well, it kind of depends on who that anyone is, what agenda they have, and whether the orphan is actually an orphan. Like, if the kid has parents, she’s not an orphan, and you don’t really have any right to swoop in like a Christian White Knight and tell the kid’s family and village that you can raise the child so much better, give the child so much more, that it is only right and decent that you should take the child away. Nothing like guilting a poor family into handing over their children to the Better People. Kind of reminiscent of how Madonna got herself her very own black baby from Africa (because, what the hell, Angelina was getting all the attention!!!).
What is it with rich people from the West swooping down upon these sad countries like vultures and plucking up whatever morsels tickle their fancy? The Christian missionaries are the worst and always have been. The deal has always been do what we say, live the way we think you should live, worship our god, and we’ll give you food, medicine, and written language.
I’m not saying these poor, messed up countries aren’t poor and messed up. They are. And I’m not saying the people of these places are some kind of noble savages that we should admire from afar. They’re not. But are the only choices glorification of primitivism or 18th- and 19th-century—style imperialistic religious and moral evangelism?
Not to mention kidnapping? Ok, ok, alleged kidnapping. And, right, the Baptist 10 weren’t really trafficking in children the way “trafficking in children” is usually understood. They weren’t going to sell them into slavery or sex services, or cook and eat them. They probably did intend to feed, clothe, and shelter them. And teach them the Righteous ways of the Lord. The Baptist’s concept of the Lord, that is. Maybe three squares a day is worth being kidnapped and indoctrinated by missionaries. Maybe the proper paperwork shouldn’t matter when a country has experienced catastrophe and children are dying and much worse villains than moralistic do-gooders are lying in wait to get a piece of the pie.
But written permission to remove children, any children, from their country, any country, after a disaster, any disaster, is the law, and no one, not even righteous, altruistic, evangelical, imperialistic, religious packs should be allowed to function above the law. No one, especially not righteous, altruistic, evangelical, imperialistic, religious wolves, should be allowed to roam poor countries luring children away from their families and villages with promises of better food and shelter.
In the service of doing right, you don’t get to do wrong. In the service of charity, you don’t get to steal. In the service of God, you don’t get to become God. In the service of saving lives, you don’t get to design those lives in your own image. At least you shouldn’t get to.